- time
- 2026-09-30 16:18:54
- pipeline
- isu_pipeline
- run
- diamsp2026
- step
- 4 calendar event identity
- object
- diamsp2026
- model_requested
- anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5
- model_returned
- anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5
- provider
- Claude Platform on AWS
- latency_s
- 2.75
- prompt_tokens
- 628
- completion_tokens
- 205
- cost_usd
- 0.003306
- finish_reason
- stop
- json_error
- False
- review_verdict
- review_note
- call_id
- 2761dab4-70e2-4891-b8b0-4202205c092f
Answer
{
"why": "The calendar event is Diamond Spin 2026, an International Competition in Katowice, POL, on 2026-10-15 to 2026-10-18. The only candidate is the ISU Junior Grand Prix Gdansk 2026, held 2026-10-08 to 2026-10-10 in a different city, with a different name and a different event type (gp_stage). The only overlap is the country and a loose date window. The dates do not overlap and the roster overlap is 0 of 0, so it gives no support. A separate tournament in the same country a week apart is plausible, so this is not the same tournament.",
"decision": "new"
}Task
Is this event from the ISU calendar the same tournament as one of the candidate events already in the database? The ISU calendar may list one tournament twice (an ISU event and an 'International Competition' with other categories) — that is still one tournament. Options: a candidate id, 'new', 'unsure'.
Dossier
{
"calendar": {
"names": [
"Diamond Spin 2026"
],
"subtypes": [
"International Competition"
],
"codes": [
"diamsp2026"
],
"season": "2026/27",
"dates": [
"2026-10-15",
"2026-10-18"
],
"country": "POL",
"city": [
"Katowice"
],
"entries": 0
},
"candidates": [
{
"event": [
207245,
"ISU Figure Skating Junior Grand Prix Gdansk 2026",
"Junior Grand Prix Poland",
"2026/27",
"2026-10-08",
"2026-10-10",
"POL",
"Gdansk",
"gp_stage",
"https://isu-skating.com/figure-skating/events/eventdetail/isu-jgp-gdansk-2026/"
],
"evidence": [
"dates within ±7 days, same country"
],
"roster_overlap": "0 of 0 calendar entries"
}
]
}System
You help maintain a figure skating results database. Decide strictly from the dossier. Choose only among the options given. If the evidence is insufficient, answer 'unsure'. Reply with a single JSON object: {"decision": <candidate id>|"new"|"unsure", "why": "..."} Output only the JSON object: no text before or after it, no Markdown, no code fences. Put all your reasoning into the "why" field.Usage
{
"cost": 0.003306,
"is_byok": false,
"cost_details": {
"upstream_inference_cost": 0.003306,
"upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.001256,
"upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.00205
},
"total_tokens": 833,
"prompt_tokens": 628,
"completion_tokens": 205,
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"video_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0,
"cache_write_tokens": 0
},
"completion_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"image_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0
}
}