- time
- 2026-09-30 16:21:14
- pipeline
- isu_pipeline
- run
- denkova-staviski-solo-ice-dance-cup
- step
- 4 calendar event identity
- object
- denkova-staviski-solo-ice-dance-cup
- model_requested
- anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5
- model_returned
- anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5
- provider
- Claude Platform on AWS
- latency_s
- 4.89
- prompt_tokens
- 613
- completion_tokens
- 483
- cost_usd
- 0.006056
- finish_reason
- stop
- json_error
- False
- review_verdict
- review_note
- call_id
- 4d56e8fc-c4f5-4696-b9ee-c80289adbcff
Answer
{
"why": "The calendar event 'Albena Denkova Solo Ice Dance Cup' (Solo Ice Dance, Sofia, BUL, 6-8 Nov 2026) matches candidate 207257 'Albena Denkova Cup 2026' (Denkova-Staviski Cup). The candidate is in the same season, city and country, and its dates (3-8 Nov) fully contain the calendar dates. The name is the same apart from the 'Solo Ice Dance' label, which looks like a category of the same tournament listed separately. Roster overlap is 0 of 0, so it gives no evidence either way. Nothing points to a different event.",
"decision": 207257
}Task
Is this event from the ISU calendar the same tournament as one of the candidate events already in the database? The ISU calendar may list one tournament twice (an ISU event and an 'International Competition' with other categories) — that is still one tournament. Options: a candidate id, 'new', 'unsure'.
Dossier
{
"calendar": {
"names": [
"Albena Denkova Solo Ice Dance Cup"
],
"subtypes": [
"Solo Ice Dance"
],
"codes": [],
"season": "2026/27",
"dates": [
"2026-11-06",
"2026-11-08"
],
"country": "BUL",
"city": [
"Sofia"
],
"entries": 0
},
"candidates": [
{
"event": [
207257,
"Albena Denkova Cup 2026",
"Denkova-Staviski Cup",
"2026/27",
"2026-11-03",
"2026-11-08",
"BUL",
"Sofia",
"international_other",
"https://isu-skating.com/figure-skating/events/eventdetail/albena-denkova-cup-2026/"
],
"evidence": [
"dates within ±7 days, same country"
],
"roster_overlap": "0 of 0 calendar entries"
}
]
}System
You help maintain a figure skating results database. Decide strictly from the dossier. Choose only among the options given. If the evidence is insufficient, answer 'unsure'. Reply with a single JSON object: {"decision": <candidate id>|"new"|"unsure", "why": "..."} Output only the JSON object: no text before or after it, no Markdown, no code fences. Put all your reasoning into the "why" field.Usage
{
"cost": 0.006056,
"is_byok": false,
"cost_details": {
"upstream_inference_cost": 0.006056,
"upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.001226,
"upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.00483
},
"total_tokens": 1096,
"prompt_tokens": 613,
"completion_tokens": 483,
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"video_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0,
"cache_write_tokens": 0
},
"completion_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"image_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 257
}
}