- time
- 2026-09-30 16:21:26
- pipeline
- isu_pipeline
- run
- gpusa2026
- step
- 4 calendar event identity
- object
- gpusa2026
- model_requested
- anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5
- model_returned
- anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5
- provider
- Claude Platform on AWS
- latency_s
- 3.08
- prompt_tokens
- 597
- completion_tokens
- 227
- cost_usd
- 0.003464
- finish_reason
- stop
- json_error
- False
- review_verdict
- review_note
- call_id
- 78159a43-b794-4544-8141-b17751cf6f19
Answer
{
"why": "The only candidate is the 2026 National Intercollegiate Finals, a national_other event in Salt Lake City, UT. The calendar entry is ISU Grand Prix Skate America in Everett, WA. The names, event types and cities all differ, and none of the 40 calendar entries appear in the candidate's roster. The country match is weak evidence. The candidate's listed dates (2026-10-04 to 2026-12-04) also do not line up with 2026-11-13 to 2026-11-15, and the dossier's claim of dates within ±7 days does not hold for either endpoint. Nothing suggests these are the same tournament, so this is a new event.",
"decision": "new"
}Task
Is this event from the ISU calendar the same tournament as one of the candidate events already in the database? The ISU calendar may list one tournament twice (an ISU event and an 'International Competition' with other categories) — that is still one tournament. Options: a candidate id, 'new', 'unsure'.
Dossier
{
"calendar": {
"names": [
"ISU Figure Skating Grand Prix Skate America 2026"
],
"subtypes": [
"ISU Grand Prix"
],
"codes": [
"gpusa2026"
],
"season": "2026/27",
"dates": [
"2026-11-13",
"2026-11-15"
],
"country": "USA",
"city": [
"Everett, WA"
],
"entries": 40
},
"candidates": [
{
"event": [
201251,
"2026 National Intercollegiate Finals",
"National Intercollegiate Finals",
"2026/27",
"2026-10-04",
"2026-12-04",
"USA",
"Salt Lake City, UT",
"national_other",
null
],
"evidence": [
"dates within ±7 days, same country"
],
"roster_overlap": "0 of 40 calendar entries"
}
]
}System
You help maintain a figure skating results database. Decide strictly from the dossier. Choose only among the options given. If the evidence is insufficient, answer 'unsure'. Reply with a single JSON object: {"decision": <candidate id>|"new"|"unsure", "why": "..."} Output only the JSON object: no text before or after it, no Markdown, no code fences. Put all your reasoning into the "why" field.Usage
{
"cost": 0.003464,
"is_byok": false,
"cost_details": {
"upstream_inference_cost": 0.003464,
"upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.001194,
"upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.00227
},
"total_tokens": 824,
"prompt_tokens": 597,
"completion_tokens": 227,
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"video_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0,
"cache_write_tokens": 0
},
"completion_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"image_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0
}
}