- time
- 2026-09-30 16:25:13
- pipeline
- isu_pipeline
- run
- dencu2027
- step
- 4 calendar event identity
- object
- dencu2027
- model_requested
- anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5
- model_returned
- anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5
- provider
- Claude Platform on AWS
- latency_s
- 2.64
- prompt_tokens
- 615
- completion_tokens
- 181
- cost_usd
- 0.00304
- finish_reason
- stop
- json_error
- False
- review_verdict
- review_note
- call_id
- 9918200c-85d1-4f4e-955a-a5c797a741e4
Answer
{
"why": "The calendar event is the Denver Cup International 2027 in Denver, CO, on 2027-03-10 to 03-13. The candidate is the U.S. Solo Ice Dance International in Atlanta on 2027-03-05 to 03-06. The names and cities differ, and the date ranges do not overlap. The only shared evidence is the same country and dates within a week, which is weak. Roster overlap gives no support because the calendar lists 0 entries. The two look like separate tournaments, so this is a new event.",
"decision": "new"
}Task
Is this event from the ISU calendar the same tournament as one of the candidate events already in the database? The ISU calendar may list one tournament twice (an ISU event and an 'International Competition' with other categories) — that is still one tournament. Options: a candidate id, 'new', 'unsure'.
Dossier
{
"calendar": {
"names": [
"Denver Cup International 2027"
],
"subtypes": [
"International Competition"
],
"codes": [
"dencu2027"
],
"season": "2026/27",
"dates": [
"2027-03-10",
"2027-03-13"
],
"country": "USA",
"city": [
"Denver, CO"
],
"entries": 0
},
"candidates": [
{
"event": [
207305,
"U.S. Solo Ice Dance International",
"U.S. Solo Ice Dance International",
"2026/27",
"2027-03-05",
"2027-03-06",
"USA",
"Atlanta",
"international_other",
"https://isu-skating.com/figure-skating/events/eventdetail/us-solo-ice-dance-international/"
],
"evidence": [
"dates within ±7 days, same country"
],
"roster_overlap": "0 of 0 calendar entries"
}
]
}System
You help maintain a figure skating results database. Decide strictly from the dossier. Choose only among the options given. If the evidence is insufficient, answer 'unsure'. Reply with a single JSON object: {"decision": <candidate id>|"new"|"unsure", "why": "..."} Output only the JSON object: no text before or after it, no Markdown, no code fences. Put all your reasoning into the "why" field.Usage
{
"cost": 0.00304,
"is_byok": false,
"cost_details": {
"upstream_inference_cost": 0.00304,
"upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.00123,
"upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.00181
},
"total_tokens": 796,
"prompt_tokens": 615,
"completion_tokens": 181,
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"video_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0,
"cache_write_tokens": 0
},
"completion_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"image_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0
}
}