- time
- 2026-09-30 16:23:56
- pipeline
- isu_pipeline
- run
- bo2027
- step
- 4 calendar event identity
- object
- bo2027
- model_requested
- anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5
- model_returned
- anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5
- provider
- Claude Platform on AWS
- latency_s
- 2.5
- prompt_tokens
- 638
- completion_tokens
- 175
- cost_usd
- 0.003026
- finish_reason
- stop
- json_error
- False
- review_verdict
- review_note
- call_id
- b0f6f2cd-f388-49c0-81c4-a6f2322c96ca
Answer
{
"why": "The calendar event is Bavarian Open 2027 in Oberstdorf, GER, 19-24 Jan 2027. The only candidate is the NRW Solo Ice Dance Trophy in Dortmund, 15-17 Jan 2027. The names differ, the cities differ, and the dates do not overlap. The only shared evidence is the country and a loose date proximity. The roster overlap is 0 of 0, so it gives no support. This is a different tournament, so it should be added as new.",
"decision": "new"
}Task
Is this event from the ISU calendar the same tournament as one of the candidate events already in the database? The ISU calendar may list one tournament twice (an ISU event and an 'International Competition' with other categories) — that is still one tournament. Options: a candidate id, 'new', 'unsure'.
Dossier
{
"calendar": {
"names": [
"Bavarian Open 2027"
],
"subtypes": [
"International Competition"
],
"codes": [
"bo2027"
],
"season": "2026/27",
"dates": [
"2027-01-19",
"2027-01-24"
],
"country": "GER",
"city": [
"Oberstdorf"
],
"entries": 0
},
"candidates": [
{
"event": [
207283,
"NRW Solo Ice Dance Trophy Dortmand",
"NRW Solo Ice Dance Trophy Dortmand",
"2026/27",
"2027-01-15",
"2027-01-17",
"GER",
"Dortmund",
"international_other",
"https://isu-skating.com/figure-skating/events/eventdetail/nrw-solo-ice-dance-trophy-dortmand/"
],
"evidence": [
"dates within ±7 days, same country"
],
"roster_overlap": "0 of 0 calendar entries"
}
]
}System
You help maintain a figure skating results database. Decide strictly from the dossier. Choose only among the options given. If the evidence is insufficient, answer 'unsure'. Reply with a single JSON object: {"decision": <candidate id>|"new"|"unsure", "why": "..."} Output only the JSON object: no text before or after it, no Markdown, no code fences. Put all your reasoning into the "why" field.Usage
{
"cost": 0.003026,
"is_byok": false,
"cost_details": {
"upstream_inference_cost": 0.003026,
"upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.001276,
"upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.00175
},
"total_tokens": 813,
"prompt_tokens": 638,
"completion_tokens": 175,
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"video_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0,
"cache_write_tokens": 0
},
"completion_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"image_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0
}
}