- time
- 2026-09-30 16:25:16
- pipeline
- isu_pipeline
- run
- baltcu2027
- step
- 4 calendar event identity
- object
- baltcu2027
- model_requested
- anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5
- model_returned
- anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5
- provider
- Claude Platform on AWS
- latency_s
- 2.52
- prompt_tokens
- 615
- completion_tokens
- 225
- cost_usd
- 0.00348
- finish_reason
- stop
- json_error
- False
- review_verdict
- review_note
- call_id
- ba33a9f8-3064-43bb-9bc1-bf9d617dc6a1
Answer
{
"why": "The calendar event is Baltic Cup 2027 in Gdansk, POL, on 2027-03-10 to 2027-03-14. The only candidate is Maria Olszewska Memorial 2027 in Łódź, POL, on 2027-03-02 to 2027-03-07. The names and cities differ, and the date ranges do not overlap (the candidate ends 3 days before the calendar event starts). The only shared evidence is the same country and dates within ±7 days, which is weak. The roster overlap is 0 of 0, so it gives no support either way. These look like two separate Polish events in consecutive weeks, so this is a new tournament.",
"decision": "new"
}Task
Is this event from the ISU calendar the same tournament as one of the candidate events already in the database? The ISU calendar may list one tournament twice (an ISU event and an 'International Competition' with other categories) — that is still one tournament. Options: a candidate id, 'new', 'unsure'.
Dossier
{
"calendar": {
"names": [
"Baltic Cup 2027"
],
"subtypes": [
"International Competition"
],
"codes": [
"baltcu2027"
],
"season": "2026/27",
"dates": [
"2027-03-10",
"2027-03-14"
],
"country": "POL",
"city": [
"Gdansk"
],
"entries": 0
},
"candidates": [
{
"event": [
207301,
"Maria Olszewska Memorial 2027",
"Maria Olszewska Memorial",
"2026/27",
"2027-03-02",
"2027-03-07",
"POL",
"Łódź",
"international_other",
"https://isu-skating.com/figure-skating/events/eventdetail/maria-olszewska-memorial-2027/"
],
"evidence": [
"dates within ±7 days, same country"
],
"roster_overlap": "0 of 0 calendar entries"
}
]
}System
You help maintain a figure skating results database. Decide strictly from the dossier. Choose only among the options given. If the evidence is insufficient, answer 'unsure'. Reply with a single JSON object: {"decision": <candidate id>|"new"|"unsure", "why": "..."} Output only the JSON object: no text before or after it, no Markdown, no code fences. Put all your reasoning into the "why" field.Usage
{
"cost": 0.00348,
"is_byok": false,
"cost_details": {
"upstream_inference_cost": 0.00348,
"upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.00123,
"upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.00225
},
"total_tokens": 840,
"prompt_tokens": 615,
"completion_tokens": 225,
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"video_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0,
"cache_write_tokens": 0
},
"completion_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"image_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0
}
}