- time
- 2026-09-30 16:04:55
- pipeline
- isu_pipeline
- run
- gpusa2026
- step
- 4 calendar event identity
- object
- gpusa2026
- model_requested
- anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5
- model_returned
- anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5
- provider
- Claude Platform on AWS
- latency_s
- 2.98
- prompt_tokens
- 597
- completion_tokens
- 229
- cost_usd
- 0.003484
- finish_reason
- stop
- json_error
- False
- review_verdict
- review_note
- call_id
- fc9f6f5e-e926-457d-8fed-285ad28be294
Answer
{
"why": "The only candidate is the 2026 National Intercollegiate Finals, a national-level event in Salt Lake City, UT. The calendar entry is ISU Grand Prix Skate America 2026 in Everett, WA, on 2026-11-13 to 2026-11-15. The two differ in name, event type (national vs. ISU Grand Prix) and city. The only shared attribute is the country. The candidate's listed dates (2026-10-04 to 2026-12-04) are a wide span that merely contains the calendar dates. Roster overlap is 0 of 40 entries. The candidate is therefore a different tournament, and Skate America has no match in the database.",
"decision": "new"
}Task
Is this event from the ISU calendar the same tournament as one of the candidate events already in the database? The ISU calendar may list one tournament twice (an ISU event and an 'International Competition' with other categories) — that is still one tournament. Options: a candidate id, 'new', 'unsure'.
Dossier
{
"calendar": {
"names": [
"ISU Figure Skating Grand Prix Skate America 2026"
],
"subtypes": [
"ISU Grand Prix"
],
"codes": [
"gpusa2026"
],
"season": "2026/27",
"dates": [
"2026-11-13",
"2026-11-15"
],
"country": "USA",
"city": [
"Everett, WA"
],
"entries": 40
},
"candidates": [
{
"event": [
201251,
"2026 National Intercollegiate Finals",
"National Intercollegiate Finals",
"2026/27",
"2026-10-04",
"2026-12-04",
"USA",
"Salt Lake City, UT",
"national_other",
null
],
"evidence": [
"dates within ±7 days, same country"
],
"roster_overlap": "0 of 40 calendar entries"
}
]
}System
You help maintain a figure skating results database. Decide strictly from the dossier. Choose only among the options given. If the evidence is insufficient, answer 'unsure'. Reply with a single JSON object: {"decision": <candidate id>|"new"|"unsure", "why": "..."} Output only the JSON object: no text before or after it, no Markdown, no code fences. Put all your reasoning into the "why" field.Usage
{
"cost": 0.003484,
"is_byok": false,
"cost_details": {
"upstream_inference_cost": 0.003484,
"upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.001194,
"upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.00229
},
"total_tokens": 826,
"prompt_tokens": 597,
"completion_tokens": 229,
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"video_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0,
"cache_write_tokens": 0
},
"completion_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"image_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0
}
}